George: the Bikinis nightclub, the barista and the Constitution

Seattle – Amazon, the hub of the city’s retail revolution, is the only commercial destroyer in the northwest.
In the nearby city of Everett, what free card and other bikinis barista, give new meaning, coffee is a stimulant, caused by the City Council, asked the baristas to almost naked when they work regulations. In turn, the barista has hired a lawyer to propose an argument that is closely related to the current freedom of controversial speech. Their arguments might surprise them, Aristotelian. To some extent.
Everett did not succumb to hypocritical strong opposition: police chiefs and city prosecutors accused womens bikinis sale  coffee stations to attract, sometimes bad customers, and some coffee makers did too. The proliferation of urban reports in sexual violence at Bikini coffee stations, “the main recommendation is” the wearing of the garment designer is simple and natural. “Seattle Broadcasting Corporation reported that” 2014, Java Juggs owners admit to running brothels.” From then on, the barista must wear shorts and vests at least. The new dress code should not be mistaken for ambiguity. In fact, it has a remarkable specificity (it says “bottom half anal fissure” and more detailed breasts), barista exams, and law enforcement may require anatomical measurements.
What makes this thing not just obscene is that the barista is ready to call the constitution artillery. They are in the way of debate and defending the freedom of speech, either the most important or the most beleaguered: on campus. Says the barista:
The regulations prohibit Bikinis for the violation of the first amendment, because they are “based on content and based on the viewpoint of” limit “, does not allow the burden womens bikinis sale  and cold” freedom “to express their female power sources, positive body image” and other things. Bikinis nightclub is a brand information “communication” cordial and friendly.”
The regulations only regulate the speech “public foundation” in bikini coffee station, aiming at them because Everett does not agree with their message “restrictions” communication channels.” Ziska says that if the clothes cover tattoos on her legs, arms, wrists, back, neck and hips, she can’t have such interesting conversation clients. Brittany Giazzi and Leah Humphrey believe that the same perforation and scar on them, respectively.
Forever in the hearts of the barista in all the charges they further “in addition to the kitchen sink complaints – for example, this is a” violation of the Equal Protection Ordinance “, because their goals (” women’s protection “), not the burden of the people. On the contrary, how much attention, even imagination, Ziska and her colleagues believe is the strain of teleology.
In a recent speech in Greg Weiner in Washington and Georgetown University in the United States, a hypothetical university political philosopher and frequent contributor to the library law and freedom in the campus website, urging debate participants, like Aristotle. It’s unethical (based on their propaganda right) and purpose (end). Say deontologically is to speak as an independent good, regardless of its moral or social purpose, if it has one. The purpose of the argument is to emphasize why – what should we treasure speech?
Aristotle is here, he’s not the barista’s definition of human language using creatures, making tattoos, perforated expression values, body parts, etc., lower than the basic. Weiner pointed out that the Supreme Court’s first amendment case law provided the most powerful protection for speech and political statements, involving the protection of autonomous goods. The fundamental purpose (telos), though not the sole purpose, is the right to freedom of speech, to protect a heavily armed other right.
Therefore, the first amendment not only correctly protected speech, but also to protect the “speech”, a free society should also give generous protection, even if there is no expression of public purpose, just make people happy expression. The advantages of protection but the speech — the central speech about ranking academic institutions in pursuit of truth and justice and other important public affairs more stringent than coffee right shows, among many other things, their tattoos, piercings and scars.
Everett should have latitude to balance the happiness of other public goods and even business advantages, liberty and her colleagues from tailoring minimalism. Universities should protect almost absolute freedom of political views, classical and correct definitions of assumptions